Moo-chelle's Gestapo Is At It Again!

Apparently it's her job to monitor the School kids' lunches. 

North Carolina officials have said there was a misunderstanding when a preschooler’’s homemade lunch was sent home for not meeting certain nutritional requirements, but now a second mother from the same school has come forward exclusively to The Blaze to say the same thing happened to her daughter.
Diane Zambrano says her 4-year-old daughter, Jazlyn, is in the same West Hoke Elementary School class as the little girl whose lunch gained national attention earlier this week. When Zambrano picked Jazlyn up from school late last month, she was told by Jazlyn’’s teacher that the lunch she had packed that day did not meet the necessary guidelines and that Jazlyn had been sent to the cafeteria.
The lunch Zambrano packed for her daughter? A cheese and salami sandwich on a wheat bun with apple juice. The lunch she got in the cafeteria? Chicken nuggets, a sweet potato, bread and milk.
“She never eats breakfast or lunch at the school,” Zambrano said of her daughter during an interview with The Blaze. “We always wake up early and make her lunch.”
It happens “every so often”
That day, Zambrano said she picked Jazlyn up from school and asked if she ate her lunch.
“She’’s not picky about food but you have to be on top of her,” she explained.
When Jazlyn said she didn’t eat what her mother had made her, Zambrano went to her teacher and demanded to know what happened. She said the teacher told her an official had come through that day to inspect students’’ lunches and that those who were lacking certain food groups were sent to the cafeteria. After she received her cafeteria food, the teacher told Zambrano, Jazlyn was told to put her homemade lunch back in her lunch box and set it on the floor.
Zambrano said the teacher told her it was not the first time student lunches have been inspected, and that officials come “every so often.”
Part of a regular program?
The policing of children’’s food at West Hoke has been portrayed as an isolated incident, but a curious memo Jazlyn brought home to her mother seems to point to something more.
The memo Jazlyn brought from the school outlines the necessary nutritional requirements students’’ homemade lunches must contain: two servings of fruit or vegetables, one serving of dairy, one serving of grain and one serving of meat or meat substitute. Included with the memo was a separate sheet, this one a bill for the cafeteria food Jazlyn was served.
The memo, dated Jan. 27 with the subject line “RE: Healthy Lunches,” was signed by school principal Jackie Samuels and said, while “we welcome students to bring lunches from home …… it must be a nutritious, balanced meal with the above requirements. Students, who do not bring a healthy lunch, will be offered the missing portions which may result in a fee from the cafeteria.”

 

Satan doesn’t always roar like a lion, but sometimes  slithers like a snake.

These phoney unemployment numbers

The Bureau of Labor Statistics, who of course is told what to say by the the administration shows the unemployment rate at 8.3 percent.
However, Gallup shows U.S. unemployment at 9%!  So who do we believe?
So who do you trust? Are you as tired as I am over all these phoney unemployment numbers?


MY Opinion?
There is No way that unemployment is going down. 
And yet Obama's "approval"numbers are at 50% and his economic performance approval numbers are at 44%.  I'm sorry but i don't believe that either.

The January unemployment numbers were GOOD? The best jobs report we have had in three years?

 January Unemployment Rate Falls to 8.3 Percent as 243,000 Jobs Are Added?   Yeah, that really sounds like  a good report, but it ain't so!.

Well here's an  explanation that maybe even most brain-dead Obama worshipers can understand, ( I said maybe)!
OK, here we go.. 
by John Crudele.  New York Post, 

Everyone, of course, would be thrilled if 243,000 jobs were actually created in the month of January. Hallelujah! 

Remember, we are talking about the month when companies go into hibernation because of bad weather and temporary Christmas jobs end. Jobs aren’t created in January. They are lost.

Yet there it is in the Labor Department release yesterday — total non-farm payrolls rose by 243,000 in January and the unemployment rate decreased to 8.3 percent.

A lie? Political manipulation? Or maybe it’s just that most people don’t understand what they’re looking at. The answer is the latter.

Those 243,000 jobs are the total after seasonal adjustments.

The question you should be asking is, what’s the un-tampered-with number before the adjustment?

Glad you asked. The Labor Department reported a loss of 2,689,000 jobs in January.

Seasonal adjustments are intended to smooth out holiday bumps like that. But because of the depth and unusual nature of the nation’s Great Recession, those seasonal adjustments are being skewed.

Here’s how it works: In January 2010, as I said, there was an actual, unadjusted job loss of 2,858,000 jobs.

To make it simple, the government computers were expecting a bigger unadjusted loss than the 2,689,000 jobs because last January’s decline was 2,858,000.

Why weren’t there as many job losses this January? Very likely because the weather throughout the country is a lot milder this year than during the past two January's.

A loss of jobs that isn’t as bad as expected turns into a job gain. Does that mean there really are 243,000 new jobs out there? Absolutely not. 

Let’s say there are rumors in your company that 300 people are going to be laid off. Instead, management decides to fire just 200.

Two hundred people, of course, have lost their jobs. But, adjusting it for expectations, 100 people didn’t get fired. Using this analogy, the government would say that, on an expectation-adjusted basis, 100 jobs were created.

That’s sort of what happened in the January employment report because of seasonal adjustment.

The numbers themselves shouldn’t be changed because continuity from year to year is important for comparisons. But people should be alerted when seasonal adjustments are screwing with the numbers.

Someday maybe the Obama administration will tell the truth!    Yeah, someday, maybe even in our lifetime.   But I doubt it..  Or when hell freezes over.

President Obama's stewardship of the nation? Or a Sinking Ship?

I think the analogy of a grounded ship and President Obama's stewardship of the nation was a proper one. one. And I also I think that the analogy of George Bush to a stupid Chimpanzee was a despicable one, but the people on the left never saw it that way. But like  many Democrats they only see what they want to see. They see only what suits their purpose  at the time.
Now, we move on: to President Obama.   
And My Opinion:
President Obama should not be immune to criticism, no American president ever was.  Should he be given a Free Pass only because he is our First African American president?  I would say certainly not. 
When will the blacks in America stop complaining, crying, whining, and moaning whenever he is criticized? And when will they hold his feet to the fire when he's wrong?  I'm afraid that the answer to both of those questions would be NEVER!


The liberal's and especially the blacks in America seem to want to sugar-coat everything this man says and does.  They will never admit to any of his failures.  But they seem to call every republican that dare to call this president on the carpet every slang name in their vocabulary.  George Bush is still being blamed for everything that Obama has done that has failed and they are so many, to many to list.   But you know them all and you know them well.
Is there  any doubt that the Democrats take the black vote for granted?  No there isn't but they don't see it that way, they just drink the kook-aide and follow.   Even Barack Obama told the Congressional Black Caucus, that they should "Stop whining!".
He told them loud and clear to “Take off your bedroom slippers. Put on your marching shoes,” he said, his voice rising as applause and cheers mounted. “Shake it off. Stop complainin’. Stop grumblin’. Stop cryin’. We are going to press on. We have work to do.” Yes he told them that in his best ghetto accent.   Funny isn't it how his tone and delivery changes when he addresses a black audience.  If a white person ever did that they would be asked to Step Down! 
 But the black  audience looked up to President Obama as if he was their Savior and yes, their Messiah, ready to follow his  institutions.
OK, I'm done here.

Are the Obamas are the result of Affirmative Action and reverse racism.?

 Are the Obamas are the result of Affirmative Action and reverse racism?
My Opinion! 

I would say that they definitely are.
Wasn't his speech to the Congressional Black Caucus enough to prove the point?  Wasn't his answer to the country's black leaders enough proof  that he feels that he has been giving away too much in talks with Republicans — and not doing enough to fight black unemployment, which is nearly double the national average at 16.7 percent.
Who is he but a self-absorbed, greedy, racist, socialist to tell anyone else what is wrong in America? This is a useless, corrupt moocher who has had a  hatred for this country from day one, the same country that  has given him and his family a lifetime of luxury.  And yet we still see this despicable hatred for America in every speech that he makes. 

Michelle Obama. an "Angry black woman" ?

Earlier this week, I've been reading a lot and just about every here and there I couldn't help but see articles about  people are trying to pin the "angry black woman" stereotype on Michelle Obama. What confuses the heckity heck out of me is that I've never even heard  of that term or stereotype. I've heard of the "angry trailer-park woman" stereotype that was a fixture on Jerry Springer. I've heard of the "angry joyless liberal" stereotype that was a fixture on "All in the Family." You never saw Meathead enjoying life, except when he was getting frisky with Gloria.. I've heard of "Angry Black Gangsta male" stereotype, and even like some of the music it produces. I've even heard of  "Angry Black Gangsta Rappers" using Angry Black terms like the dreaded "N" word.
I have to admit I was a little surprised that she herself used the term "Angry Black Woman,’”
Now I have a pretty good background in the field of stereotyping, so  I should recognize current and historic racial prejudices, and "Angry Black Woman" is a complete mystery to me. It's really a new one to me.  I get the impression that someone invented a nonexistent racial stereotype out of whole cloth and tried to pin it on the Angry White RightWingers. Can anyone tell me where this claptrap came from?  Maybe she made it up herself?


Well that pretty much sums it up

Michelle Obama, shopping at Luxury lingerie shop Agent Provocateur - the sexiest shop in the world? Say it isn't true!

Michelle Obama snobs American stores by her $50,000 shopping spree at Agent Provocateur, known as the sexiest  and most pricey boutique in the world. 

 

 

My Opinion? 

It's the hypocrisy of this women that gets me. And the fact that the American economy is in  such bad shape, and still, she had to spend $50,000 in a British shop. I'm tired of it. It's almost as if they are rubbing it in our faces.

And silly you, thought that she only shops at Target.

But I guess that Nothing's too good for the Queen.